Roadmap to the downtown’s future

By Don Bowen/Fremont Tribune
Wednesday, Jul 02, 2008 - 10:41:08 am CDT

Some downtown merchants heard things they thought could boost the downtown at a special presentation Tuesday morning.

As the culmination of a months-long series of meetings of some downtown merchants and property owners, the presentation called for the elimination of one-way streets in downtown Fremont as one of its major points to help boost the area.

“It’s the one thing I would do immediately,” said consultant Marty Shukert of Omaha, who added that the one-way streets make the downtown harder to manage in a vehicle.

“Downtown should be inviting,” he said. “It’s not good when the first thing someone driving up to a downtown is a sign that says ‘Do Not Enter.’”

The elimination of one-way streets was only one point made by the downtown group.

Other improvements need to include improved sidewalks, additional green space, development of second story apartment units, collaboration between Midland Lutheran College and Metropolitan Community College to develop incentives to bring more students downtown, additional restaurant and entertainment venues, review of city codes to eliminate any that would hinder downtown development and develop a model for financing downtown projects.

Shukert said two potentially big assets for downtown already exists just a couple of blocks away.

“You need to make the downtown a learning community with the nearby colleges,” he said. “You have to find a way to make the campuses part of downtown and make the downtown part of the campuses.”

The biggest step may be implementing such a project, he said.

“The city at this point is a full partner that is pushing for this rather than reacting to requests. This is going to cost something,” Shukert said.

Estimates from the consultant indicate that it could cost nearly $15 million over several years to get the downtown to where these programs are set. That includes an estimated $4 million in city government financing. About $3.6 million of that could be in improving the sidewalks and streets.

The consultant’s conceptual financing idea suggests that the $3.6 million could be raised in bonds with the rest of the city financing coming from general funds and a tax increment financing district.

“That’s something that would have to go to the council,” Hartwig said of any potential bond issue. “This is just a hypothetical. There’s no proposal. I don’t know if the council would support something like that, but it is something that could happen.”

Hartwig said there is no proposed timeline on the table for any of the ideas, including the financing.

Some of the merchants like what they heard.

“It meant a lot to me as a business owner to see this excitement from the city,” said Bob Missel, who owns Sampter’s clothing store.

Since coming to Fremont in January 2007 as the new city administrator, Bob Hartwig has been an advocate for strengthening the city’s downtown.

“That puts us in a different place than before,” Missel continued. “Everybody wins.”

Bill Perry said he thinks the success of downtown will benefit the whole community.

“I think everybody will benefit,” Perry said. “When I’m putzing around I walk around and talk with people. I’m surprised at the number of Lincoln people, Wahoo people, Woodcliff people, western Omaha people come here. They want a reason to come here.”

Ginger Rosenthal, who owns The Blue Bottle Coffeehouse, said she was pleased with the thorough process of developing the plan.

“I think they’re placing areas in the right order if we want to make this an attractive place for people to come,” she said. “Downtown needs an inviting portfolio. The streetscape needs to be inviting so that people will want to live in second floor apartments. When they wake up in the morning we want them to want to walk down here.”

Hortencia Villasenov, who owns Mi Tierra dress shop, said she likes some of the plan.

“I like the idea of renovating the streets,” she said. “Change all of the one-way streets. I agree that we need some green space to make downtown look better. My biggest issue is parking. We need more parking.”

The downtown presentation will be delivered again Tuesday night at the regular meeting of the Fremont City Council.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Email Address Required
   
Connie
Jul 2, 2008 11:57 AM
I work in downtown Lincoln and am thrilled that these ideas and excitement are being generated! One thing that helps bring UNL's students into downtown are eateries that give them discounts and appreciate all of their customers. Benches to sit on and enjoy are also a plus. On wednesdays at noon, the "Updowntowners" host a performance series in the Foundation Gardens area and have a huge variety of performers - singers, musicians, dance groups, etc. We have a lot of talented people - adults and children - in Fremont so hope something like that could be worked in also Since John C Fremont Park is now cleared of everything but a few trees, it would be a simple matter to set something up there until a better solution arrives, such as one of the empty lots downtown or how about the lot just north of the Opera House? If the stores stayed open a little later on more than one night a week, it might help too! I don't get back to Fremont until 6:30 pm so they're not available to me and many other commuting workers. According to economists, we're doing good for Fremont by working out of town and bringing our earnings back to spend! Good luck and I'm looking forward to seeing some great things happen!
fremonter
Jul 2, 2008 12:12 PM
i will gladly purchase a new toilet to flush more of our money down. i will set it up on main st. any other bright ideas to waste our money? we need more eating places like we need a hole in the head.
Downtown Driver
Jul 2, 2008 12:39 PM
I agree that the one way streets should be eliminated. I am not sure what that has accomplished. Same with 5th and 6th Streets being one way all the way to Bell.
Fremont Native
Jul 2, 2008 12:52 PM
I understand there is going to be music in the City Park on a regular basis this summer. Hopefully that will help to bring more people to the area. It will also be a nice use of the park other than for Fremont Days.
Diana
Jul 2, 2008 12:56 PM
All of these ideas sound very nice. In fact just like the ideas presented about 5 years ago. After all the facts were presented then it was determined the downtown merchants couldn't afford the ideas! Mr. Schukert was the planner at that time also. Will the downtown merchants be expected to pay for these improvements? In these tight economic times we need to be very watchful of how we spend our money.
one way neighborhood
Jul 2, 2008 1:13 PM
to Downtown Driver:
leave 5th and 6th streets out of your rant please.... i live on 6th and i really like it that it's one-way... nice and quiet - less traffic....i think MOST of the people that live on these steets would agree
Negative Ned
Jul 2, 2008 1:19 PM
It just blows my mind that you have to hire someone from Omaha to tell the meeting that the one way streets are a bad thing for downtown.
I wonder how much they paid for that one.
Most of the citizens of Fremont thought that was a dumb thing when they first changed them to one way.
Changing the streets back should be done immediately as that couldn't be a big money thing to do, unless they have to hire a consultant to tell them how to do that. Maybe they will have to talk it to death before anything moves on it.
Get rid of the one way streets and more people will go downtown.
Lincolnite
Jul 2, 2008 1:32 PM
I agree downtown needs changes, but I'm not so sure changing the streets back to two-way is such a good idea; seems to me they were changed in the 60's because of congestion and parking issues.
Populate the buildings that are downtown; updating buildings in downtown would make a big difference. Secure fast, casual dining that is reasonably priced and bring in places where young adults (and older ones too) have free wi-fi. Bring back a theater.

Landlords, make your rent reasonalble; it's better to get a little less than you want then to get nothing at all.
Excellent
Jul 2, 2008 2:10 PM
Finally, they are coming to their senses about the one-way streets - they are awful! I believe downtown will be a LOT more inviting once that change itself is made.

I love the idea about apartments downtown - once my kids are finished being raised, I would love to live in one of the old buildings downtown - I'm just not sure how residents would secure their vehicles overnight......my only problem with that.
th and th Streets
Jul 2, 2008 2:13 PM
Along with changing the downtown streets back to one-way, we also need to make sure to change back "C" and "D" especially.....along with 5th & 6th Streets. I'm sorry to say this, but what idiots decided to change those streets way back when whenever. We need them all changed back to regular streets. How much nicer getting to and around the downtown area that would be.
MArk
Jul 2, 2008 2:46 PM
How about spending some money to fix up older residential areas? When people find out I'm from Fremont they don't mention downtown they mention the old neighbor hoods. The city should loan money, interest free, to people who want to fix their sidewalks, relax overly restrictive codes that make it unfeasable to fix up older homes. Recognize the people that are improving their property, prod people that are letting their property slide to get with the program AND get a housing inspector that is on the peoples side!
cmcb
Jul 2, 2008 3:00 PM
Fremonter,

I completely disagree with your comment:

"we need more eating places like we need a hole in the head"

Fremont has some restaurants, but most are not that great and don't offer much variety. Seeing Lazlo's go was a disappointment.

Downtown improvement is a huge issue in moving this city out of the stubborn old ways that it has been stuck in. There is a great deal of charm that a small town's downtown area has to offer and very little of it has been capitalized upon.

I think that one-way streets are the most inefficient use of roadways in a small town. There is no need for them. Residents on these streets appreciate them, but they are useless. Unless these streets are handling thousands of cars per day, there is no reason to have this. It will make downtown much more easy to navigate and tenants should see traffic flow.

Now, if we can only get the city to move on these ideas...
Questioning Logic
Jul 2, 2008 4:01 PM
Why are the taxpayers being expected to spend $15 million dollars to improve a shopping area in downtown? Why do the college and others need to push business downtown?
What are the taxpayers doing for other shopping centers and merchant districts?
Downtown property owners need to invest, not the taxpayer.
I see why the business owners were happy with the presentations.
If you owned those old buildings wouldn't you?
Realist
Jul 2, 2008 4:12 PM
I think we are looking at times that are coming when we will be glad to have an area like downtown again where you can park and walk to several stores to do your shopping. Gas prices are never going to go back to they were and may even go higher.
The smaller stores can serve up a little more variety of products if the owners are creative. I think for the most part people are tired of the Wal-Marts and the big box stores where there is no service and no one knows the products in the store. Wal- Mart is a place of cheap products and its always the same thing.
Downtown could be a great place again, a hub for shoppers to enjoy their shopping experience.
Kudo's to Bob Missel at Gerald Sampters for hanging in there with downtown and being a 1st class retailer for Fremont.
Aftershopper
Jul 2, 2008 4:24 PM
I agree with "Connie" regarding store hours. I work in Valley and get home after 6 p.m. IF I wanted to try to shop downtown and spend more money, but have some unique choices...store owners are going to have to have later hours during the week and weekends. (Of course, you could also try opening earlier than 10 a.m. on Saturdays.) It's been my opinion for years that downtown owners only want the day crowd anyway.

Several people have great ideas about making downtown more attractive. Green space, convenient shopping hours, eateries, wifi, etc will bring them in!
CW
Jul 2, 2008 4:40 PM
Fremonter,

Maybe you don't think we have a need for a few new restuarants but I totally disagree. We need BETTER places to eat. I get tired of the only options being pizza, tacos, or burgers and fries. We need more variety. Something fun and new could bring money into the city.
fremonter
Jul 2, 2008 5:44 PM
to realist:
the downtown stores prices are way out of line as are some stores in the mall. we need wal-mart and stores like it. maybe its cheap stuff, but the prices are reasonable. if one wants the best, then they need to go to the high priced stores. at least we have a choice here in fremont. i will not buy anything downtown and over pay.
Downtown on Welfare
Jul 2, 2008 7:07 PM
$15,000,000 price tag????? Oh well, that is only $725 for every man, woman and child in Fremont. And the same community could not maintain their swimming pools? can't afford to exand the library? can't afford this or that?
Welfare for Downtown. No wonder the same property owners who have slum apartments above their stores are happy about this proposal and getting taxpayers to pay the bill.
Wouldn't you??
scoop
Jul 2, 2008 9:07 PM
Wal- Mart is a place of cheap products and its always the same thing. And Fremont is a town with cheap wages. Let's get some decent paying jobs in this town,and then worry about revamping downtown when the people of Fremont can afford to shop someplace besides Walmart.
It will cost to redo the streets.I like it on Main when I can park in front of the desired store that I want to shop in. And more apartments ?The tennants will take the parking,and if you can't park near your door,many people will not rent.
cmcb
Jul 3, 2008 9:57 AM
Fremont's biggest issue is infrastructure. We had an opportunity to land a large tech company looking for a Midwest location and we could not because there is limited phone service access. I think growth and expansion is great (at a reasonable pace). If Fremont wants to expand, the city needs to invest in the infrastructure before we can even begin to think that large companies with higher paying jobs will plant roots in the city.
h
Jul 3, 2008 11:48 AM
Are some of you actually reading this article before you post?? It says that the total pricetag is $15 million, but doesn't say that the CITY will be paying that much. It clearly states that $4 million would be city financing, with 3.6 of that being for improving sidewalks and streets. Sidewalk/street improvement and upkeep are a responsibility of the city anyway, downtown resurgence or not.

In regards to the following comment:
"the downtown stores prices are way out of line as are some stores in the mall. we need wal-mart and stores like it. maybe its cheap stuff, but the prices are reasonable. if one wants the best, then they need to go to the high priced stores. at least we have a choice here in fremont. i will not buy anything downtown and over pay."

If you are truly looking to save money, you will look at the QUALITY of the products you buy, not just the cost. It makes no sense to buy low priced, cheaply made, low quality products when you know they will just need to be replaced after a few uses. It is a much better investment to spend a bit more initially to purchase a quality product that will last.
DEB
Jul 3, 2008 1:13 PM
OH WOULDN'T IT BE GRAND TO SEE SOME REAL STORES DOWNTOWN. WE NEED SOME WOMENS CLOTHING STORES LIKE FASHION BUG AGAIN OR ANYTHING THAT IS REASONABLY PRICED. STORES THAT THE AVERAGE SHOPPERS WOULD ENJOJ AND NEED, NOT JUST SPECIALITY SHOPS.
really H Knows
Jul 3, 2008 2:38 PM
To "H" here is a revelation.... the city funding you speak about comes from the taxpayers. Too many people think that government money is Free and just drops out of the sky.
Please look at the %15 million closely. Do you really believe the property owners downtown are going to kick in large somes of money whene they won't spend 2 cents on improvements or maintenance?
Here is another way to look at it . . . $15 million divided by the number of businesses downtown --- should taxpayers spend that huge amount to keep mediocre businesses open? If so, kick in to all other businesses throughout the community and make them happy too.
Reminds me of the song "Lookin' For A Handout"
get a clue
Jul 3, 2008 4:05 PM
The investment that needs to be made in downtown is not just to keep businesses open...it is to greatly improve the most historic part of our community. Downtown holds the largest concentration of businesses in any area of Fremont. We're not just talking about specialty shops or restaurants -- we're talking about financial institutions, law offices, automotive repair businesses, insurance companies, construction companies, hair salons, dance studios....the list goes on. Downtown is the heart of our community and to improve it will improve the entire city of Fremont. You want better jobs and a better community -- the vitality of a downtown says so much about a community and is a factor in bringing in new businesses. It's an investment and one that is overdue.
Wasting Money
Jul 3, 2008 4:10 PM
Pouring millions into a downtown that has not been flourishing for a long time does not make sense for taxpayers. This is definitely not a time for pork barrel Fremont projects. The two-way streets are a great idea, but the money part should be put up to the voters - do you want to invest millions in downtown? Few would, other than downtown business owners. George got out before it was too late; so should others.
h
Jul 3, 2008 5:00 PM
I know that the city funding comes from the taxpayers, I am talking about the other the $11 million. First of all, it says that it won't be done all at once and it could be a years long process, so yes the business owners will be paying part of it, a little at a time. There are also grants available for these types of improvements, some government funded, some not. The ones that are government funded are not local, but state and federal government. This money is there, set aside for improvements. If we don't get it someone else will, so us not using it would not be saving anyone money, our money would just be going to improve someone else's town instead.

If we can revitalize the downtown area, it is not just an investment in those businesses, but an investment in our town's future. The more revenue they generate, the more sales tax we bring in. Right now, Fremonters like to pay sales tax to make improvements in Omaha and other cities. Let's instead invest this money back into our own town, where we will be the ones benefiting instead
Questions
Jul 3, 2008 5:10 PM
Aren't some downtown stores still open on Thursday nights, or has that been changed? Why not have specials for just Thursday nights to draw people into town? It would be nice if there were a soda fountain/ice cream store downtown.
Dex
Jul 3, 2008 7:09 PM
So downtown needs $15 million to make it nicer and more inviting to shoppers. I would think that improvements to the buildings and green space should be up to the property owners. I am sure some would say my house could use some repairs to be more appealing to my neighbors, but nobody is going to give me the money to fix it up or get someone to fix it for me and charge the tax payers. I do not think the tax payers of Fremont need to spend a dime to help the business owners downtown salvage their businesses. Free enterprise people, it is what this country was built on. Sink or swim.
Welfare For Downtown
Jul 3, 2008 8:47 PM
Which Store does "H" own?
Now he clarifies that it doesn't all come from local taxes . . .it comes from state and federal taxes.
Hmmmm, I agree, where does that money come from "H'? It comes from taxpayers.
Giving $15 million to a bunch of businesses barely holding on, businesses that are not competitive, businesses who do not market and advertise effectively, using proven media like the newspaper, is a WASTE of money. Let free enterprise prevail and yes, sink or wim.
Many businesses came to Fremont and did not locate downtown. Why? Shoppers have evolved and the downtown in Fremont and many other communities have taken a back seat to malls, strip centers, conveniently located businesses.
I am sure the downtown property owners want this welfare windfall.
But Fremont is not a wealthy community and busineeses and industries will not come to Fremont just based on a pretty downtown. Take a look at who owns what downtown and you will soon see who iss pushing this agenda.
Fremont has money for nothing and tears down a pool because they couldn't maintain it.
Cities across America are growing and not because taxpayers are paying welfare to their downtowns.

Which business does "H" work at? or what building does he own?
I agree with the comment "Looking for a Handout"
Fremont is not growing.... it is obvious why not. It is not the responsibility of the taxpayers to bail out poorly operated businesses who have not invested in their businesses or property for years. Thus creating the dismal downtown that exists today.
Wondering
Jul 4, 2008 11:22 AM
As a taxpayer and near-downtown-resident, I was wondering if the Tribune could make a list of every building on Main Street and list the buildings' owners. If the city is discussing pouring millions into downtown, shouldn't this information be made public? (I know, I know, that information is available at the courthouse, but a lot of time & work for everyone to look up.)
h
Jul 4, 2008 5:24 PM
I do not work or have any financial investments downtown. I am also not a man. I don't appreciate you making assumptions about me when you know nothing about me. I did work at a telemarketing business downtown about 13 years ago as a summer job during college, but that is as close as it gets. It seems to me like downtown is starting an upswing, and we should do what we can to support it. My interpretation of this is that none of the money will go to specific businesses, but rather to improve and spruce up the common spaces and public areas. We need to take care of our city, or it will die, and then where will we be?
Downtowns Welfare
Jul 4, 2008 5:36 PM
Wondering's point is very valid. Print a list of all downtown property owners, and business owners, not just on Main Street. Then Fremont taxpayers will clearly understand who is pushing this fleecing of the taxpayers.
Businesses outside of the downtown, pay for their store fronts, landscaping, sidewalks, parking lots, streets, lighting and more. THen they advertise andmarket their businesses. Why is downtown exempt from thinking they should also live in that environment.
I remember when Wal-Mart came to Fremont and then relocated their store - the city government did everything they could to discourage them and make life difficult for them. But, look at the investment they made in the community. Look at the customers they draw to Fremont. And downtown did nothing.
Let free enterprise prevail. The city and the chamber should be promoting growth, bringin new businesses and industries, not tax supported welfare programs for the old dilapidated downtown.
re wondering
Jul 4, 2008 11:51 PM
If you want to know who owns the properties downtown, or any place in Dodge County, all you have to do is call the tax assessor's office and they can send you a list. It's very simple. But what does having that information prove?
A faithful taxpayer
Jul 5, 2008 8:22 AM
Yes, puplish a complete list of who owns all of the properties in the downtown business district and who owns the businesses. That will tell all of the taxpayers, including me, who is actually pushing for these handouts.
Notice the suggestion that each person go to the tax assessor's office individually? Yes, that will surely keep the information secret and away from those taxpayers at large, who pay the bills.
Also, if the list is published, by the Tribune, look at the names of the owners and multiple property owners too, then look at the people pushing it.
I agree, poorly run businesses, in buildings not updated for years, waiting for a bail out by the taxpayers.
Fremont should be spending money on the entire community and things to bring jobs and industry to Fremont, not welfare for selected retailers.
It's funny, one way streets were placed inthe downtown to attract more shoppers and now they want them removed for the same reason.
Yep, I guess I should pay more taxes to supplement poorly run businesses in poorly maintained and non-improved buildings downtown! While other businesses thrive on their INVESTMENT into their facilities and businesses?
Successful businesses ADVERTISE and MARKET thrir businesses plus give shoppers reasons to shop with them (selection, quality products, service, reputation, competiveness). Downtown wants it all, for nothing.
And now they are going to run the CVB too? Watch all of the efforts and events being designed to help downtown merchants --- until that organization dies too. The Dodge County Board did not think this one through.
Seen Fremonts Ups Downs
Jul 5, 2008 8:33 AM
"H" is absolutely correct. "Fremont needs to take care OF OUR CITY OR IT WILL DIE".
That does not mean spending $15 million on the old downtown. It means the ENTIRE CITY.
It starts with maintaining the pools so you don't have to abandon them, the parks, the city's investments, the infrastructure, residential areas, promoting indutrial development, growing the community -- all under competent leadership that is very needed today.
Please note that there a MORE businesses not downtown than located in the downtown district. And none of them are asking for welfare. Should they?
Print This Story Email This Story

Blogs

Calendar of Events

Photos